Skip to content

Chief Executives Board

Sections
Personal tools

The UN system’s strategy

Document Actions
One United Nations (Ch 2, paras 20 - 22)

20.      Three premises have guided the UN system’s strategy to support implementation of the Millennium Declaration’s development objectives. First is the holistic nature of human centred development and the consequential linkages and interdependencies both among all three pillars of collective action addressed in the Declaration and among its development goals. For example, while the goal of reducing and ultimately eradicating extreme poverty should be understood as central, progress towards it depends heavily on progress towards all the Declaration’s other objectives. Consider how hunger is the single largest contributor to disease, weakening the immune system, reducing capacity to recover from infection and inhibiting achievement of the goals relating to health. Malnutrition has consequences for goals relating to different stages in the lifecycle: it limits school completion for children; reduces labour productivity and jeopardizes employment, and hence poverty reduction, among adults; and increases the risk of degenerative diseases in later life. At the same time, lack of progress in stemming the spread of HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis will jeopardize improvements in areas such as education, employment and health services.

21.      The second premise of the UN system’s strategy is that the achievement of the Declaration’s goals and targets requires sustained and, in most cases, enhanced economic growth. This is particularly so in countries facing the greatest development challenges. The UN system’s strategy has therefore placed a core emphasis on improving the conditions for growth in developing countries.

22.      This relates directly to a third basic premise: that the achievement of the Millennium Declaration’s development objectives requires the creation of a supportive, enabling international environment. A successful, pro-development and timely conclusion of the Doha Trade Round and the provision of more aid and debt relief have so far fallen short of the Monterrey vision. The UN system stands united in its commitment to realize that vision.

Box 2.1
Box 2.1: The Follow-up to Monterrey
The Monterrey Consensus established a sustained intergovernmental follow-up process in both the General Assembly and the Economic and Social Council. In addition to considering different financing issues on the annual agenda of its Second Committee, the Assembly, every two years, now hosts a two-day High-Level Dialogue on Financing for Development. ECOSOC also holds an annual high-level meeting in the spring on different aspects of the Monterrey Consensus with the leadership of the World Bank, the IMF, the World Trade Organization and (since 2004) UNCTAD.

In line with the innovative and participatory modalities established by the Monterrey Conference, inter-agency support to the follow-up involves close collaboration among all concerned institutions and organizations, and a systematic outreach effort. The Financing for Development Office (FFDO) of the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, the World Bank, IMF, WTO, UNCTAD, UNDP and the regional commissions cooperate closely in preparing the follow-up reports for the General Assembly. Within their respective mandates, they also work together to organize multi-stakeholder consultations on the Conference follow-up. Open to Member States and relevant civil society and business organizations, these consultations bring different stakeholders together to strengthen and advance the work underway on each set of issues by official bodies, civil society and private groups.
One United Nations (Ch 2, para 23)

23.      As the Millennium Project Report has pointed out, more aid will need to be provided in forms that can flexibly meet the incremental costs to developing countries of meeting the MDGs, thereby promoting sound governance through longer-term commitments and enabling financing for the recurring costs. In order to ensure debt sustainability, a larger proportion of the additional aid should take the form of grants. At the same time, considerable scope exists for increasing the effectiveness of aid: by improving the alignment of aid with national development strategies and priorities, and by aligning donor policies and practices with those of the recipient countries.(10)

One United Nations (Box 2.2)
Box 2.2: The "Three Ones"
The wide international agreement reached around three core principles to improve coordination of national responses to HIV/AIDS, known as the "Three Ones," exemplifies a successful effort towards harmonization of donor policies, in the spirit of the Rome Declaration on Harmonization, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Monterrey Consensus.

Agreed in April 2004 by donor and developing countries, the "Three Ones" amounted to: one agreed HIV/AIDS action framework, which provides the basis for coordinating the work of all partners; one national AIDS coordinating authority, with a broad-based, multisectoral mandate; and one agreed country-level system for monitoring and evaluation. They emerged through a preparatory process initiated by the Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), working in collaboration with the World Bank and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

The "Three Ones" will help enable donor and recipient countries to work together more effectively; they will also help to increase country-level coordination and to enhance efficiency in the use of resources devoted to HIV/AIDS responses.

Many partners at the country, regional and global levels have enthusiastically embraced the "Three Ones." In 2004, the UNAIDS Secretariat found that, out of 66 countries examined, 81 percent had up-to-date national AIDS frameworks, 95 percent had national AIDS coordinating authorities and 77 percent had working groups to develop national monitoring and evaluation systems.
One United Nations (Ch 2, paras 24 - 27)

24.      From these premises, the UN system’s strategy for advancing the Millennium Declaration’s development objectives has proceeded along four components:

  • Analysis: defining and assessing the policy dimensions of achieving the Millennium Development Goals, based on a consensus among partners for the reforms, investments, financing options and strategies for “scaling up.”
  • Campaigning and advocacy: collaboration with a wide range of partners, extending well beyond the UN family, to foster a self-sustaining movement, with strong national, regional and international roots.
  • Operations: goal-driven assistance to address directly the key constraints to progress, guided by the mandates, comparative advantages and resources of the UN system at the country level.
  • Monitoring: tracking and reviewing progress towards the MDGs.

25.      The Millennium Project has sought to analyze and identify the most promising strategies for meeting the MDGs. Drawing on expertise from a wide array of research institutions, and with the support of many UN system organizations, the Project has put forward practical ways to guide ongoing national and international poverty reduction efforts, including key operational priorities, organizational means of implementation and financing structures.

26.      The Millennium Campaign has, in turn, served as the main platform for the UN system’s advocacy strategy in support of the Declaration’s implementation. The Campaign has mobilized and reinforced political support for the Declaration by working with parliamentary networks, local authorities, the media, faith-based organizations, youth organizations, the business sector, NGOs and other entities outside the UN system. The campaign and advocacy efforts have been building broad-based coalitions to promote the MDGs and to work with industrialized countries on raising support for increased aid, debt relief and expanded access to markets, technology and investments.

27.      At the operational level, UN organizations have focused on mainstreaming the MDGs into their programmes and activities. The country-owned and country-driven Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) and the UN Common Country Assessments (CCA) and UN Development Assistance Frameworks (UNDAF) are all being geared to help maximize the coherence and effectiveness of the system’s support for country-level implementation of the Millennium Declaration.

One United Nations (Box 2.3)
Box 2.3: United Nations Development Group: Coordinating UN country-level support for the Millennium Declaration
The United Nations Development Group (UNDG) is one of four Executive Committees established by the Secretary-General in the main areas of UN work, with the others focusing on peace and security, humanitarian affairs and economic and social affairs. Now expanded to include not only UN Programmes and Funds, but also a large number of specialized agencies, UNDG aims to improve the effectiveness and coherence of UN system activities at the country level. It does so by developing policies and procedures to facilitate cooperation among member organizations in analyzing country issues, planning support strategies, implementing support programmes, monitoring results and advocating for change. Responsible for elaborating guidelines for the Common Country Assessment (CCA) and the UN Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF), UNDG is spearheading the effort to shape coordinated operational support to countries in meeting the MDGs.
One United Nations (Ch 2, paras 28 - 34)

28.     The Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers provide an important link among national public actions, donor support and development outcomes towards meeting the MDGs. They are prepared by governments through a participatory process engaging civil society and involving the World Bank, the IMF and other development partners. As the framework for domestic policies and programmes to reach the MDGs in a given country, the PRSP serves as the basis for concessional lending by the World Bank and the IMF. When formulated before a PRSP, Common Country Assessments provide useful analytical inputs for preparing the national poverty reduction strategy, which itself can then contribute to the UN Development Assistance Framework.

29.     The UNDAF represents the collective contribution of UN organizations to addressing identified development challenges at the country level. As a common strategic framework for UN operational activities, UNDAF provides both: an integrated response to national priorities and needs; and the legal basis for detailing the modalities and content of UN work in supporting developing countries. The UNDAF results-matrix identifies areas for joint programming and shows how the concrete results of the programmes and projects of each organization will contribute to national development goals. Led by the Resident Coordinator, the UN Country Teams assist the incorporation of the MDGs in national poverty reduction strategies, including through the PRSP process. Inter-agency reflection is now underway on how to enhance the integration of non-resident UN organizations into this process, and, more generally, on how to ensure that development outcomes at the country level benefit from all capacities available within the system, operational and analytical.

30.     To complement these efforts, “Theme Groups” provide country-level fora for sharing information on key cross-sectoral areas, such as gender equality, human rights, HIV/AIDS, food security and rural development. These groups help to advance a common vision to shape the UNDAF. They facilitate the efforts of UN Country Teams to promote complementarities, particularly when it comes to furthering the key objectives of country ownership and national capacity. In addition to representatives of UN organizations, members of these groups include governments, donors and civil society. In the specific case of HIV/AIDS, the overall coordinating work of the UN Theme Group steers support for implementation of National Aids Strategies, being provided from within fully-integrated UN Country Team Implementation Support Plans.

31.     At the regional level, the five UN regional commissions have contributed significantly to raising awareness; conducted research and policy analysis; and promoted policy dialogues and exchanges of national experiences through their intergovernmental fora. Their regional reports—prepared in cooperation with the UN Secretariat, the specialized agencies and other regional partners—have evidenced both the trends and heterogeneity within regions; analyzed the underlying causes influencing sub-regional divergences; identified good practices; and provided policy perspectives and recommendations for action.(11)

32.     The regional commissions have also fostered and facilitated policy exchanges and knowledge-sharing on key issues that, while relevant to all countries, need to be addressed in ways that take into account the varying circumstances of different regions and countries, such as: relationships among poverty reduction, growth and equity; conditions for a sustained process of poverty reduction; links between economic policies and the social MDGs; the combination of broad-based human capital formation with social protection and specific antipoverty programmes; and policies for addressing inequalities.

33.     The regional coordination meetings organized by the Commissions, and called for by the Economic and Social Council, have facilitated harmonization of the UN system’s activities at the regional and sub-regional levels. The meetings provide a mechanism for coordinating the various activities of UN system organizations and strengthening the effectiveness of their technical assistance to help countries integrate the MDGs and other priority objectives into their policy frameworks.

34.     The annual reports of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly on the implementation of the Millennium Declaration stem from a broad system of monitoring and reporting to track global, regional and national progress towards the MDGs. These reports have provided an overview of progress in implementing the Declaration’s commitments and a comprehensive statistical analysis on progress towards the goals. They have been based on global and regional monitoring by an Inter-Agency and Expert Group on MDG Indicators, coordinated by UN-DESA; on country-level monitoring coordinated by UNDP; and on other inputs from many parts of the system. They have also been complemented by an array of detailed progress reports produced by individual organizations. The most wide-ranging of these is the World Bank and IMF’s annual “Global Monitoring Report,” which provides an integrated assessment of progress on policies and actions needed to achieve the MDGs and related conference outcomes.(12) 

One United Nations (Box 2.4)
Box 2.4: Tracking progress on the MDGs
Monitoring progress towards the MDGs at the global level requires the collaboration of international agencies and close consultation with national experts and statisticians. The Inter-Agency and Expert Group on MDG Indicators coordinates the efforts of UN organizations, international parties and national statistical services. Coordinated by UN-DESA, the group meets twice a year to review enhanced collaboration on data compilation, methodological development and statistical capacity-building. All specialized agencies of the UN and the regional commissions are members of the group, which also includes other international statistical services, representatives from national statistical offices and experts in selected areas. Lead agencies have been designated by the Secretary-General to steer the data and methodological developments for each of the 48 MDG indicators.

The results of this work are reflected in The Millennium Development Goals Report 2005, supplemented by a more extensive on-line report and an on-line database (millenniumindicators.un.org), which contains country-level data for each of the selected indicators, as well as other background data and explanatory material. Maintained by the United Nations, this database comprises the most up-to-date series provided by the designated lead agency for the indicator in question. An annual regional and global analysis of this data is available at the same website.

In order to assist countries in monitoring and reporting on the MDGs, and in collaboration with other parts of the UN system, UNICEF developed DevInfo. Released in May 2004, this software tool allows for the collection and analysis of standard and specific user-defined indicators. DevInfo is being used by an ever-increasing number of governments, UN country teams, academic institutions and others to provide standardized and comparable reporting on MDGs, to advocate their achievement through policy measures and to develop national institutional capacity.
One United Nations (Ch 2, para 35)

35.     This inter-agency effort has been accompanied by monitoring and reporting on individual MDGs and related internationally agreed goals undertaken by the UN organizations and agencies most directly concerned, under the guidance of their respective governing bodies and with the support of other parts of the UN system. As noted above, country-level reporting by UN Country Teams has focused increasingly on monitoring MDG implementation.

3134fn



11.  ECLAC released Meeting the Millennium Poverty Reduction Targets in Latin America and the Caribbeanin December 2002. ESCAP issued its regional MDG report entitled Promoting the Millennium Development Goals in Asia and the Pacific in May 2003. Similar reports have been published or are being published by ECA, ECE and ESCWA.

12.  Global Monitoring Report 2005—Millennium Development Goals: From Consensus to Momentum and Global Monitoring Report 2004—Policies and Actions for Achieving the Millennium Development Goals and Related Outcomes, World Bank.

 

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Copyright Notice Credits RSS